On top of that, YouTube TV's interfaces are snappier and more responsive. This app owes the original YouTube some love, as it's all visibly inherited. the interface used while watching shows - is snappy and responsive and organized. YouTube TV, though, is (nearly) the picture-perfect experience of the post-cable world. While this category is admittedly a little lopsided, there are arguable faults on both halves of the YouTube TV vs. ![]() Winner: YouTube TV, by a ratio of infinity:fifty. Though I'm too cheap to upgrade to a 200-hour cap for $5 per month. As a paying Sling TV subscriber myself, I can attest that this is not enough. That's the best cloud DVR option in the game, while Sling TV offers the least of any competitor, with only 50 hours in its entry-level tier. Sling TV, fortunately, does have some of the channels you'll find in YouTube TV. Recently, YouTube TV added Magnolia Network to its main tier, a channel you need to spend $6 extra to get on Sling TV. Sling Orange gives you 31 channels, Sling Blue gives you 41 and Sling Orange + Blue gives 47. YouTube TV offers more than 100 channels, while Sling TV delivers either less than a third or less than half of that stack. YouTube TV is $33 to $13 more expensive than Sling TV, so we're not exactly shocked that YouTube TV delivers more channels. Smart TVs (Android TV, LG, Samsung, Vizio), Fire TV, Roku, Chromecast with Google TV, Apple TV, Xbox, Android, iPhones and iPads, Xfinity, Google TV, Tivo Stream 4K, Windows, Coxģ (Unlimited option available in $84.99 per month package) ![]() Smart TVs (Android TV, Hisense, LG, Samsung, Sharp, Sony, Vizio), Fire TV, Roku, Chromecast with Google TV, Apple TV, Xbox One and Series X|S, PS4 and PS5, Android, iPhones and iPads 47 (Orange + Blue)ĥ0 hours (or 200 hours for $5 more per month) However, according to the NAD, if an advertiser refuses to participate or comply with its recommendations, NAD will refer the matter to the appropriate regulatory agency, which is typically the Federal Trade Commission.$40 (Blue or Orange), $55 (Orange + Blue)ģ1 (Orange), 41 (Blue). As self-regulatory industry organizations, they don’t have the power to issue fines or other sanctions. ![]() The decisions issued by the NARB and NAD are not legally binding. In the spring of 2023, YouTube TV’s baseline monthly subscription fee went up by 12.3%, as the internet pay-TV package increased from $64.99 to $72.99 per month. Moreover, in certain markets, Charter and other cable providers offer regional sports networks (RSNs) but YouTube TV does not therefore, according to the ad-review bodies, Google did not have a valid reason for factoring in the cost of Spectrum’s Sports View option ($7/month extra for most plans) to the price comparison. Per the findings of the ad-review boards, customers can subscribe to a basic tier of Charter’s Spectrum TV service without renting cable boxes and thus Google failed to justify including the cost of two set-top boxes in its price comparison. ![]() In addition, in agreement with NAD, the NARB panel concluded that at least one reasonable interpretation of the challenged claim is that YouTube TV is $600 less than any comparable service available from companies traditionally associated with cable services. The NARB panel determined that the commercial disclosures were not clear and conspicuous. The price calculation underlying the challenged claim included the cost of two set-top boxes per household for “standalone cable” services. The YouTube TV spots that made the “$600 less than cable” claim included a disclosure identifying “comparable standalone cable” as the basis of comparison. In a statement released Wednesday, Google said it “disagrees with NARB’s determination that people watching the challenged commercials will somehow understand ‘cable’ to mean something other than traditional cable television.” At the same time, the company said it “intends to modify or cease the disputed advertising claim.” Google added that it “may reconsider the claim based on updated information.” In August 2023, the NAD recommended that Google discontinue the “$600 less than cable” claim Google appealed that to the National Advertising Review Board (NARB) - which upheld the NAD’s recommendation. The YouTube TV pricing claim, which had appeared in two of Google’s ads for the service, had been challenged by Charter Communications in a fast-track complaint submitted to the BBB National Programs’ National Advertising Division. Google said it will no longer claim that YouTube TV is “$600 less than cable” in its advertising, after an industry ad-review board found the assertion was potentially misleading.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |